|
Popular Topics
Link Categories
Discussions
Topic Types
Random Faqqing
There seem to be lots of things missing or that just plain don't work.
That's not a question. Its a statement. It's an honest mistake to be sure, but maybe its a sign that you should start spending more time thinking about how you might improve yourself and a little less time nitpicking every little detail of any given website.
Newest Users
|
Related News / Links
They are not seeking past damages. they just want infringing sites to either stop using the material, or pay licensing fees for it. I'm curious if any of the publishers in the attributor coalition don't offer licensing fees, or if this is just a strong arm advertising campaign for publishers that do. Either way, remember to be vigilant when writing article summaries to links that you don't accidentally copy it verbatim. Leave Comment:
Submit Post
|